Category: Opinion corner

  • Satoshi’s Vision: how far have we really gone?

    Satoshi’s Vision: how far have we really gone?

    Satoshi's vision

    When Satoshi Nakamoto presented the bitcoin whitepaper, (he) envisioned “A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash which would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution.” With his complicated cryptographic breakthrough, he hoped to revolutionize the economy or at least, the financial system.

    A simplified payment system controlled by the people and protected by its users; Satoshi’s new cash sounded like an idea from a world outside ours. He kept his identity clandestine, but at this time, only a few really bothered about who really is. He had a vision, but just like his identity; only a few really understood what exactly this goal was.

    Like wildfire, bitcoin would grow in popularity and garner interest from developers and finance enthusiasts. Apart from a brilliant peer-to-peer exchange technology, bitcoin’s economy was also argued to score above the current global economy.

    “There will ever be twenty-one million bitcoins”

    Over a trillion dollars later, bitcoin’s finite supply would emerge as its most marketable quality. Overshadowing censorship resistance and technological efficiency, bitcoin’s original vision ranks below its other features. Basking in bitcoin’s success, the concept which was influenced by Satoshi’s piece of code would grow into an over two trillion dollars worth sector and a space better known with the ability to make investors rich in the shortest period of time.

    No matter how much you try to flaunt fundamentals over ‘pumpamentals’; a majority of cryptocurrency enthusiasts are simply here to discover the next 100X and improve their financial status…in fiat. Well, only a few really care about bitcoin anymore. But how impactful has this foregoing been on Satoshis’s vision?

    Satoshi’s vision? You might have to repeat those lines from the whitepaper a number of times before any cryptocurrency investor understands it. And when they do, expect them to quickly shove it under the bus. Thing is, it matters very little now.

    Sovereignty from the government in almost every monetary activity…the original vision was a currency controlled by the people. The generation, distribution, value system, and expenditure were supposed to be championed by the people. Satoshi, however, couldn’t state the exact role he wanted the government to play here…he probably didn’t care about them; that was the goal, the vision.

    How far have we gone? To be fair, Satoshi was slightly over-ambitious. The centralized government has not only grown too strong over the thousands of years the system has existed without tangible challenges. Money on the other hand is their biggest tool of domination and control. With an infinite amount of money at their disposal and an ability to control the value of fiat to an extent, they hold almost total control over the people. A factor Satoshi might have considered before hiding his identity.

    A picture of bitcoin representing an electronic cash

    The growth of bitcoin has been met with the major involvement of the government. You’d expect them to care a little since the original goal have been abandoned long ago. But yeah, bitcoin and similar technologies are still challenges they have to face and curb to retain their supremacy.

    Adopters of this technology have also been overpowered by the tasty option of getting rich by holding volatile digital assets. A very tough temptation. With a lot of ‘new money’ flowing into this space, bitcoin trading over a million dollars is more realistic than Satoshi’s original vision. Investors would prefer this too, or Shiba Inu going to $1 rather.

    Whichever comes first; we are already too far from the initial goal and are obviously more comfortable with the financial liberation this space promises; even if it means leaning on governmental approval. An idea this technology was invented to fight.

  • Tragedy of the third coin: How far is the top?

    Tragedy of the third coin: How far is the top?

    tragedy of the third coin

    A ‘new bitcoin’, ‘the ethereum killer’…wonder how many times these two phrases have been used in the crypto space? Countless.

    Bitcoin’s introduction changed the narratives for cryptography and created relevance for blockchain technology. Its primary use? Peer-to-peer exchange transactions.

    ‘A decentralized electronic cash that enables Peer-to-peer exchange of value without double spending’ sounds like a brilliant idea, yet only few believed in this.

    Bitcoin’s surprise success quickly triggered the proliferation of similar projects claiming to be an improvement to bitcoin’s technology. Faster? Cheaper? Even though these alternatives achieved most of these, they were unable to displace bitcoin in terms of acceptability. Bitcoin retained its position as the original and most reliable peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

    For Vitalik Buterin; P2P exchange was a very narrow scope for blockchain technology, a good number of very interesting things could be achieved using the blockchain and distributed ledger system.

    Ethereum introduced smart contract technology and a virtual code executing machine which powers real utility applications and running on a blockchain which can also be used for decentralized Peer-to-peer electronic cash exchange. Ethereum’s introduction ushered in a new dimension for blockchain technology and cryptocurrency.

    Programmable money; being the ‘new cash’ was actually the least ethereum could be. In essence, it is bitcoin and many more.

    Well deserved; Ethereum climbed the stairs, from obscurity to the second-biggest blockchain and cryptocurrency project. Displacing other older projects and trailing behind bitcoin, of course; it was tipped to displace bitcoin too…it still is.

    Together at the top; bitcoin and Ethereum’s reign has lasted the longest, but this hasn’t been without stern challenges. These two coins aren’t perfect anyways. There are no perfect systems, but improvements are always a thing to smile at.

    Bitcoin’s shortcomings include a negative impact on the environment thanks to proof of work’s mode of operation. Its technology is also argued to be outdated and ‘archaic’. Many blockchain projects focused on Peer-to-peer electronic cash payment have introduced better alternatives to bitcoin’s consensus algorithms and a few tweaks to create a faster and environmentally healthier blockchain. With these features, they hoped to become the ‘new bitcoin’.

    Ethereum, on the other hand, is riddled with efficiency and economic issues, and of course; its proof of work consensus places it in the same environmental position as bitcoin.

    A couple of coins have put together proposals to tackle these issues, and many of them have received the approval of the majority of the cryptocurrency community and have soared in price as a result. A few of them have climbed the stairs to the third position — the Third coin…

    LiteCoin, XRP, Cardano, Binance coin…each of these have once occupied the third position on the ranking and a few times have been tipped to journey into the second position as they are billed as superior to either ethereum or bitcoin or both.

    Unfortunately, this never happened. These projects despite once occupying the third position and earning praise from the general community are unable to stand the challenge. Most of them have since slipped from this position. These failures are tragic…the tragedy of the third coin.

    But why do these third coins fail? Bitcoin and ethereum have the first movers’ privileges. A very important advantage. Being the first to the market and gaining many users who turned believers and maximalists, challenging these two toppers goes beyond developing superior technology. Getting the old investors to abandon the project that warmed their hearts isn’t a very simple task. Even genius-level marketing wouldn’t do this easily.

    Bitcoin maximalists would hardly listen to any argument against bitcoin, let alone accept it. This is the same with Ethereum maximalists. Despite the outrageous fees and decreased efficiency experienced by ethereum users, ethereum continues to wax stronger.

    Apart from the first mover privilege; these third coins are in fact unable to match the mastery of these two toppers. Despite boasting a better technology and economy, these alternatives are found lacking in many important aspects. New smart contract blockchains may be faster and more efficient but are hardly decentralized and less secure than the ethereum blockchain. This is hard to ignore. Sacrificing security for speed is a tough decision. Better safer than faster. A centralized blockchain defeats the whole goal.

    Many of these ambitious projects in an attempt to develop a better alternative end up reinventing the wheel. Their solutions are no different from existing ones; just a different branding and marketing schedule. The two projects at the top continue to look irreplaceable. Their technology keeps growing and getting better. Bitcoin’s latest upgrade allows smart contracts, and ethereum hopes to fix most of its issues with the ethereum 2.0. While these coins continue to develop positively, will a third coin rise from the ruins or will the tragedy continue?

  • Non-fungible token: The Turnoffs.

    Non-fungible token: The Turnoffs.

    non-fungible token

    Your reluctance to join the non-fungible token (NFT) trend is a result of any of these two instances; either you’re a maximalist of a non-nft project (probably bitcoin) or you’re discouraged by certain ‘not so good’ aspects of digital signatures.

    Previously I questioned the value system in the NFT space, but that’s just one out of the whole bunch. The current scope of NFTs is limited to just multimedia vending; a very narrow use of NFTs, in my opinion. Apart from buying and selling digital art; NFT’s utility extends miles beyond the exchange of multimedia ownership. Maybe when the wave settles, these other use cases will come to life.

    Just like every new idea, critics have presented these shortcomings of NFT technology in their arguments. But while these criticisms are valid, they don’t totally dampen the brilliance of NFT technology.

    Alright, here are some of the most popular arguments against NFTs.

    “Right-click and save”

    If you ever tried to read more about NFTs, then the higher probability is that you’ve come across this phrase. Right-click and save!…easily the biggest argument against NFTs. Your NFT art can be easily saved and used by anyone. Just like a royalty-free picture on art vending sites, this argument is by far the scariest turnoff of NFTs. A fact any NFT investor should consider and understand before throwing a dime on digital arts. But just like I said earlier, even though this is a fact NFT art collectors need to worry about, it doesn’t bite down on NFTs’ brilliance. Saving a picture doesn’t make you an owner…in essence.

    But do you even ‘own’ the multimedia attached to your NFT? Well, let’s get to that later.

    Transaction fees

    The part where blockchains claim to be a ‘cheaper’ option to mainstream alternatives should be wiped and rewritten with vague letters. Certain blockchains are multiple times more expensive than using custodial financial institutions; I’ll leave you to name these blockchains.

    NFT transactions are one of the most complicated smart contract operations currently. Minting, selling, and buying; each of these transactions involve a number of protocols working together. This generates so many charges that depending on the blockchain, it could easily scare off investors and creators. A number of blockchains charge cheaper fees for NFT transactions, but unfortunately, they are less popular than the costlier ones and might mean lesser exposure for the creator and smaller options for the buyer.

    Valuation

    You just saw an art you love on an NFT marketplace, but you had to let it go. You couldn’t afford it. If pixelated art with negligible attributes could cost a few numbers of Ether, you can only wonder what real art and photographs would cost. Well, most times they cost way lower than this pixelated art. I might be oblivious to the process of creating these arts but the valuation system in NFT is questionable.

    Tron’s Justin Sun has a history of extravagant spending, but top on his list is the millions of dollars he spent buying an NFT art. I’m clearly not a big fan of his; this is another reason to understand this stance. Certain NFT arts are way overpriced. If you ever tried to justify these prices, you will end up understanding the poor value system. A hype or a boom? I think a combination of these two words best explains the current state of things in the NFT space.

    Liquidity?

    You just bought an NFT for a certain price; you might have to worry about selling it. Unlike cryptocurrencies where an active market exists, NFT owners will have to go through the process of finding a buyer for their art. Just like the Barter trading system, the liquidity system for the NFT system is a burden for both creators and buyers.

    Ownership

    An art creator sold his art for a few hundred thousand dollars and went ahead to make this same art free of copyright issues. It raises a huge question for art collectors: Do you really own the art attached to your NFT? I probably need some extra answers and arguments. Personal research couldn’t provide enough clarity on this. If everyone can use the same property you paid a lot for without any form of permission or royalty, are you really even the owner of this property? Something art collectors should really consider before buying any art. The sellers’ integrity should be considered first.

    For art with several mints, the ownership rights are presumably distributed between all the buyers. In a case like this, every buyer reserves the rights to the ownership of this art, the question comes up again; Do you really own the art attached to your NFT?

    Rarity

    How rare is your art? Very rare right? Not sure if you can freely say the same if this particular art can be minted again and resold by the owners; or scammers. I’ve come across a number of instances where this has happened and the question gets even more important. Is it really ‘rare’ or is the statement just for aesthetics? Not sure what the perfect and factual answer to this could be. Another huge turn-off for non-fungible tokens.

    Scams and hacks

    If you still have your bored apes, then you are one of the lucky ones. A good number of people don’t have theirs anymore. Nope, they didn’t sell it; they lost it. If you’ve been following NFTs, you might come across this hazard a few times. Just like your cryptocurrencies, your NFTs aren’t safe. But here, securing your NFTs is way harder.

    I admit it, NFTs are cool, but these turnoffs are huge points to consider before dipping your toes into the non-fungible waters. As a creator or collector, these issues span across every party involved in NFT.

  • CBDCs appeal more to governments than proper cryptocurrencies.

    CBDCs appeal more to governments than proper cryptocurrencies.

    Source

    For a moment I thought; “that move by El Salvador was supposed to trigger an era of national cryptocurrency adoption”. Well, it was actually too early to say that. National governments will have a very hard time accepting cryptocurrency in its normal form. ‘Impossible’ is a rare term, but if anything comes close, this is one of them. It will take a very long time before this becomes the case…if possible.

    While El Salvador prepares to move their bitcoin gains into the nation’s education sector, most other countries are yet to take a definite stand on bitcoin and cryptocurrency. The People’s republic of China continues its ban on bitcoin and crackdown on crypto-related activities while the Federal Republic of Nigeria has officially launched its Central Bank Digital Currency — the E-Naira.

    Hey, before going further, have you Followed us on Twitter?

    Same Naira, more possibilities…the E-Naira has been received with mixed reactions from the Nigerians as the majority consider it ‘useless’; an assertion I disagree with. In comparison, the development in Nigeria is healthier for cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. China’s controversial stand on bitcoin and cryptocurrency continues to worsen. The crypto ecosystem will have to learn to steer ahead without the communist nation.

    Despite detesting the idea of a decentralized form of money controlled by the people and essentially resisting the influence of a centralized government, China is rumored to be testing out its own CBDC — the digital Yuan. Nigeria’s close neighbor and fellow west African country — Ghana is also working on releasing a digitized form of her national currency. China’s effort on the digital Yuan and a nationally owned blockchain isn’t a rumor anymore.

    One thing is common about these countries — little tolerance for proper cryptocurrencies.

    Very logically, a centralized government will expectedly detest decentralized concepts. The world government structure is centralized. The presence of a central body of authority controlling the affairs of the people is the original idea of the government; this concept is also expected to be the main feature of a government-owned ‘cryptocurrency’.

    With government-backed cryptocurrencies; it is impossible to ‘be your own bank’. Core financial activities will still require the involvement of a third party and the government retaining its veto power on activities related to this currency. From what we have seen in recent prototypes, this is exactly what CBDCs are and the government is absolutely loving it!

    As far as the adoption of blockchain as a superior financial technology goes, CBDCs are a huge breakthrough. It delights the government; not only does it equip them with an easier way to manage financial activities, but it also preserves their central power and keeps them above the people…something not obtainable with proper cryptocurrencies.

    It’s obvious that the government loves everything about cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology except for one thing — censorship resistance. CBDCs are in fact perfect; for them.

    We are seeing national governments partner with blockchain firms to launch their CBDCs on their blockchains. Fantom blockchain is reportedly working with a number of reputable banks and governments to develop CBDCs, Algorand is also rumored to be taking a similar path. The idea of a central bank digital currency resonates well with governments and is set to be the next wave of blockchain adoption. On the other hand, proper cryptocurrencies will unarguably continue to face even sterner regulations.

  • Just like bitcoin, Ethereum is not an Altcoin.

    Just like bitcoin, Ethereum is not an Altcoin.

    Every cryptocurrency enthusiast holds bitcoin in high esteem. The market placed Ethereum just below it, can’t say the same for a majority of cryptocurrency investors. Despite occupying the second position, a wide gap exists between Bitcoin and Ethereum, in terms of market capitalization. Not considering ‘First to market privilege’, bitcoin’s prestige and the portion of the market it controls are quite justifiable. Revolutionary technology, a devoted community, and a long list of ‘copies. Furnishing the whole space, it has created a major ecosystem and every other cryptocurrency project benefit from its relevance; Speaking of which spreads across disciplines and school of thought. Politics, finance, governance, mathematics…the list is continuous.

    Bitcoin’s breakthrough set off a spiral; exact copies and slightly modified copies of bitcoin’s code and functionality soon emerged. Just like the recent DeFi boom, these copies were simply bitcoin with a different name and tokenomics (probably). The term “Altcoin” was invented to accord these alternatives a more generalized name. A proper name in my opinion. An even funnier name — Shitcoin was invented by a growing community of bitcoin maximalists as a better definition of these bitcoin offspring. This group still exists and believes in the nothingness of every other cryptocurrency/blockchain project; a notion I disagree with but wouldn’t combat. Well; if we are being fair, the majority of altcoins fit perfectly into the ‘shitcoin’ description.

    If you tried paying the least attention to Ethereum, the above story is familiar. Tons of ‘killers’; copying Ethereum exact code (almost) and running different consensus algorithms. These alternative projects have survived mainly off the fact that they offer a faster and cheaper platform than Ethereum’s Layer-1. Ethereum has resisted these competitions to remain the most used and ‘copied’ blockchain project. Apart from enjoying the ‘first to market’ benefits, Ethereum’s resistance to these competitions is majorly thanks to its brilliance, originality, the fact that it houses the most reputable projects pronounced instability of alternative projects; and thanks to a strong maximalist community.

    “Originator of many things”, countless ‘copies’ and a strong maximalist community; these terms are peculiar to bitcoin and Ethereum…only. Both are in a league of their own; bitcoin controls a market capitalization of almost double Ethereum’s, but in terms of technological relevance, it is a close duel. Ethereum’s technological advancement is a level above bitcoin’s. OG bitcoiners would disagree, but even the recent tap root upgrade adopts some of Ethereum’s technology.

    An alternative should share tangible similarities to the originator and improve on its core technology. This is the case with the numerous forks and copies of bitcoin. Pretty much ‘re-invented wheels’. This is the same with the uncountable Ethereum copies as well. Ethereum itself is a huge improvement and many steps away from bitcoin’s P2P technology.

    Apart from recreating bitcoin’s decentralized value exchange system; Ethereum built a proper platform on the blockchain. A versatile platform of limitless potential. Smart contract and Decentralized application technology are novel and brainchild of Vitalik Buterin and his team of founders. Several projects have emerged separately to improve on this; basically working on improvements to the functionality and not the core technology itself. Even more, projects have been built directly on the Ethereum blockchain. Ethereum boasts the largest and most diverse blockchain ecosystem.

    bitcoin ethereum

    A personal opinion but bitcoin and Ethereum are the two most prestigious blockchain projects. Bitcoin has championed the political and economic revolution, a major factor keeping it afloat. Ethereum represents the biggest advancement in blockchain technology in terms of proper technology. Bitcoin maximalists frown at calling the orange coin ‘a cryptocurrency’; but placing Ethereum in the rank of an altcoin is an even bigger sin. Bitcoiners disagree; a big delusion.

  • Greed will catalyze the next bull run

    Greed will catalyze the next bull run

    bull run

    “Bull run comes around once in four years or just after a bitcoin halving”; I have my calendar set to July 2024; but just like my early morning alarms, I’m likely to miss it. Apart from the halving, the 2021 bull run was thought to be triggered by institutional adoption of bitcoin and cryptocurrency…at least that’s what they said. That’s not wrong anyways; Elon Musk dipped some of his Tesla money into bitcoin and spent most hours of his early 2021 days shouting “to the moon”. He’s deep in losses if he still holds on to those bitcoins. I hope DogeCoin is still very much around when his son grows up. He has a huge stash of some Dog coins to inherit…I heard. Not just the rocket man, even Tim cook applauded bitcoin at some point. If there’s anything like ‘Tech leaders’; these two guys should be somewhere up the list with Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin…of course. A worthy mention; Charles Hoskinson; you disagree…I know.

    On speculations of institutional adoption of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, a handful of enterprise-level cryptocurrency projects grew to sky-levels in just six months… or less. Social media did its bit, the hype was many levels above the propaganda. DeFi, GameFi, (and ‘MemeFi’) were the rave. Mark Zuckerberg was destined to have a huge influence on the crypto space. Despite failing with his ambitious Diem project, his Metaverse ambitions have been championed by pump-and-dump cryptocurrency projects. Elon Musk pioneered dog-themed shitcoins; Mark introduced a popular prefix for the next generation of Hype projects. Hats off to Elon though; billion-dollar projects came to life thanks to Dog tags.

    For a bull run that was “catalyzed’ by institutional adoption”, even the most innovative cryptocurrencies struggled to make the top search lists in some of the world’s most technologically advanced nations. Bitcoin’s record-setting $67,500 price was just about 3 times its previous record. $100,000 was meant to be a deserved price. That didn’t happen, not when the ‘OGs’ were busy throwing their money on some moon and ‘inu’ tokens and the newbies were struggling to survive the rampant rug pulls. Clean, rinse, repeat; even Hwang Dong-hyuk ‘s Squid game birthed some notable cryptocurrency projects. You can find them languishing in almost zero trading volume while their creators make a living off those funds pulled off the rug.

    Simply put, the previous bull run was triggered by Greed. No, not ‘institutional investors’. Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey have always been pro-bitcoin and never hid their appreciation for the technology. Micheal Saylor has always channeled that MicroStrategy money into the orange coin and JP Morgan didn’t start talking about cryptocurrencies two years ago. The halving cycle and the institutional investors’ propaganda only triggered human greed which subsequently caused a hurricane of ‘dumb money’ thrown at everything that runs on a blockchain.

    Once it runs on a blockchain, then it’s the future. It was that simple, yet funny. Even the blue-chip projects had huge loopholes in their technology and management. But it’s hard to care one bit when you have a moon flight to catch. DogeCoin raced to $0.7 per coin despite over 130 billion coins in circulation. This wasn’t because it “had a better economy than bitcoin” but because this exact statement was made by the richest man on earth and a lifelong fan of the fun token. Calling the tenth biggest cryptocurrency a ‘fun token’ feels odd anyways.

    Like a beast unleashed, the whole space ran haywire. Frequent rug pulls couldn’t quench the raging greed from a horde of investors. When one 1000X project crashes, another is born. It only takes one popular influencer or music star and the gains start to roll in.

    An almost exact scenario as the 2017 bull run. We thought that won’t repeat itself; it did…even worse. Taking a look at the 2017 raves that were short-lived, 2017 investors had way less greed. Investors were supposed to be more informed with time; turns out this wasn’t the case. The crypto space is a field of emotions; greed being the principal emotion. The ‘Bigger fool’ theory works here; no doubt.

    The next bull run? Not sure the exact time that will come, but it will come when there is enough greed. If there are any handy metrics to watch, it’s the greed and fear index; not the halving or institutional investments…if that was ever a thing.

  • 2022 Bear market: The ‘Big players’ ruined the game.

    2022 Bear market: The ‘Big players’ ruined the game.

    bear market

    “Your last chance to buy bitcoin at $30K” may sound like a failed prediction, but on a second and deeper thought, your favorite influencer and ‘trader’ might be right. Judging from recent events, bitcoin at 30k is a huge target and is growing further every day. “Plan B” might have gotten his $100,000 bitcoin prediction wrong, but he’ll have more issues if he actually followed his own analysis and bought through them. Most influencers are too clever to follow their own predictions anyways. No jibe about his brilliance anyways, his analyses are still reasonable. Unfortunately, the crypto market hardly follows ‘fundamentals’

    Bitcoin was close to some historic values. $69,000 would have been an orgasmic figure, things like that don’t happen too often…naturally. A slow and rather disappointing regression followed; hitting lower points and breaking downward resistances, bitcoin’s off-brake downtrend pulled the rest of the crypto market into a great depression. The bull market looked all synthetic; the market always looked programmed, but this time it was close to obvious. A total market capitalization of $5 trillion was realistic. If bitcoin reached the $100,000 target, that would have been easily possible…

    Everyone is a hero in a bull market. Billion-dollar meme coin projects, tons of high-profile airdrops, invincible traders, and ‘rich folks’. The buzz was felt worldwide; Peter Schiff tried to warn everyone and squeeze in his gold superiority arguments along the line. Wasn’t a really good time for him; can’t say the same about the current situation.

    Under the flourishing market, a number of projects rose to absolute fame and reveled in bitcoin’s glory to create wealth…and a little bit of utility. Corny developers had their feast and quickly filled the space with tons of projects built in the shortest time by a team of rookies who joined the space when Elon Musk was riding his doge to the moon. Heard he’s got a court case to attend to in that respect. Well, the dogefather went from moon to court, not a bad move…at all. I’m certain he has enough wits to pull that one off, easily.

    Elon’s SNL session marked the absolute top for bitcoin and dogeCoin. I’m forever skeptical about the “to the moon” slogan. Things gradually went from bright to dim and the bandwagon of mainstream artists claiming to have adopted blockchain technology quickly began to disperse. Lil Yachty and Soulja Boy made more from their shills than they ever made from jumping in and out of the booth. Making money has never been so easy. ‘Lil Boat’ never bothered to release an album since then. I wouldn’t blame him though, his last one was forgotten too quickly and he certainly has more people listening to his shills than his mumble raps.

    Do Kwon at the peak of his wealth might be worth a few billion, but his ego was worth many times that figure. It’s logical anyways, USDC was meant to die by his hands; the reverse was the case but he did put up a good fight. Unfortunately, LUNA investors took all the hit while he was left to worry about a strange knock on his door. The Luna2.0 incentive must have saved him from more strange knocks. Airdrop recipients who managed to sell at launch probably made some of their money back. Can’t say the same about those who held on. The new Luna is 90% down already, and the old Luna…you’ll need a stick to count the zeros. All good, it was fun while it lasted.

    A few friends were comfortably living off the returns they got on the bitcoin they locked on Celsius’ lending platform. The temperature quickly got too hot and it was all close to melting. Don’t know the exact degree but somewhere above the boiling point of water. Celsius claimed to be decentralized, but just like my bank, users’ funds were locked when the market conditions became ‘unfavorable’. Alright, they offered more returns than my bank anyways, so I’d still stick to the juicier offer, even if it means risking being liquidated along with the rest of the market.

    3AC? A very long story I’d love to skip…

    While traders’ and investors’ greed rose to its highest levels; developers’ and project teams’ egos and arrogance also grew to similar levels. You could get the coldest replies for suggesting a fix for some discovered bugs. Who cares about bugs and fixes when prices are going haywire and investors are rugged slowly and swiftly? The big players in the space basked in the health market to fill up their pockets and cared less about the feasibility of their solutions and the sustainability of their strategies.

    The real argument is if they had any strategy at all. LUNA and UST’s collapse probably clouded a lot of events, but a few other stablecoins got pretty unstable. Justin Sun mastered the act of following the trend; USDD was basically born in an attempt to bring the Luna sort of price growth to the Tron ecosystem. USDD was in no way an improvement from UST. Just another copy facing the same issue. In Mr. Sun’s case, $600 million is an easier war to fight. USDD stays de-pegged for a number of days now. His Excellency will ultimately do something when his stablecoin gets to the same price as Cardano.

    It’s another situation where I find enough reason to justify bitcoin maximalists’ stand on altcoins and any other thing apart from bitcoin. The orange coin’s tragic fall to $17,000 is a result of these irregularities from ‘shitcoin’ projects. that name has never been more proper. Microstrategy will have to bear their losses for now while Elon Musk gets himself a lawyer, there are a few hundred billion on the line. The rest of the space will have to hope we don’t fall into a proper “great depression”

  • Next Five years in the crypto space.

    Next Five years in the crypto space.

    What are your wildest guesses for crypto and blockchain technology in the next 5 years? what will the next five years in the crypto space look like? I’ve got two ‘mild’ ones. A fully functional Cardano blockchain and a completely stable Solana blockchain. No pun intended. Cardano and Solana, are certainly up there on my list of high-throughput Layer-1 blockchains. Just in case, Vitalik and his team couldn’t get the Ethereum blockchain to work properly; Charles’ brainchild can make a perfect fix…or alternative. Well, I just made three guesses.

    There’s hardly a sector as fast-progressing as the crypto space. Twelve years since bitcoin’s historic emergence, a couple of ‘powerful’ people have taken sides on the idea of a decentralized back-end and financial platform. As powerful as Peter Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. Despite the pull sideways (not from those two anyways); cryptocurrency has progressed rapidly and dog-themed coins are worth more than the global pet market…not just pet dogs. Depending on how famous or lucky you are; you could sell your selfies for a couple of thousand dollars. Of course, the price will depend on how rare or adult-specific they are. Or how strong your hype-marketing game is. Just a heads up anyways.

    For the technology; instead of Western Union, you can simply move your funds through Ethereum blockchain. On the worst days, that might cost you as much as $70, but that’s fine, considering how many more you have in your wallet. Lazslo Hanyeczs pizza deal didn’t just trigger a $3 trillion move, it set off a period of “on-chain” technological advancement. Even though these solutions are barely used by the majority, they are still worth more than their mainstream alternatives…some, not all of them anyways.

    The past twelve years have been lots of fun, literally. The memes and their accompanying coins made sure of that. The future looks even more interesting, both ways. Not trying to make some oracular statements, but the next few years will be one to behold and are very important to the future of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology; the technology and the politics…sorry, market.

    Government influence, decentralized applications, stablecoins, graphic stores of value…you name them. The next 5 years are already being shaped by the preceding years. If Mr. Schiff and rest of the gold community fail to prove the inferiority of bitcoin or the supremacy of their precious metal; bitcoin will be on the course to cement its place as a turbo-proofed store of value. Despite being held back by the bear market currently, it’s still bullish heading into the future. The next halving is barely two years away…

    The US and UAE governments announced their plans to regulate digital assets and tasked designated arms with putting their nations at the forefront of digital asset growth. I’d say those announcements came when the bearish sentiments already kicked in; would have been enough to push bitcoin past $100, 000. Nevertheless, positive impacts from central governments will be instrumental to the growth of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in the next 5 years. Trusting the central government to come up with positive plans for decentralized technologies is a bit double-edged anyway. This could go either way, of course. Cryptocurrency and blockchain technology have survived over a decade of rough paths with central governments, the next few years should be easier.

     next five years in the crypto space

    If Celsius hadn’t hit a rock, DeFi would have stood a chance of penetrating mainstream financial support systems. I guess they’ll have to fix their leaking roof before that. Albeit these negative events, the future still looks great for decentralized finance, Celsius inclusive. Cryptocurrency communities are evolving to truly fancy the idea of decentralization. The world outside the crypto space suffers much from centralized financial systems. DeFi, if done well, will take up this opportunity and offer a solution. A seamless and community-owned financial system.

    Luna developers failed in their attempt to build an efficient algorithmic stable coin that follows the laws of demand and supply. USDC was meant to “die in the hands” of UST. Unfortunately, that didn’t go as planned and Do Kwon will have to deal with strangers knocking on his doors and the billion-dollar fraud allegations first before putting USDC to eternal rest. That sounds easier than it really is. The failure of Terra’s UST casts a shade on the growth of algorithmic stablecoins; but before this event, this concept was growing and was on track to pose a huge challenge for stablecoins backed by air and efficient printers. Algorithmic stablecoins still have a place in the crypto space and still have good chances of being the preferred medium of value preservation in the crypto space. If not for any reason, the fact that they are backed by the same concept that powers the whole space — logic, makes them more traditional.

    NFTs might not sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars in the next five years, but they will still be a part of the space. Any celebrity selling some “rare behind the scene” pictures might have to settle for less than they charge for a feature as royalties for their NFT drops. Signatures of those arts are forever etched on the blockchain, so, they will always be there…just that they could cost (way) less.

    More on the future? Maybe a brand-new hype idea? Metaverse is already building a huge hype, the next bull run could see many Meta pumps and dumps emerge. Ethereum 2.0 will probably be finally delivered before then; interesting to imagine what could happen over the years. What’s your wild guess?

  • Accessible Virtual Reality facilities will boost industrial productivity.

    Accessible Virtual Reality facilities will boost industrial productivity.

    virtual reality

    Human communications took a huge turn during the COVID-19 pandemic; a bizarre shift. Healthy communication during the pandemic is one that involved the least contact between the communicating parties. With social life crippled to its lowest level ever, virtual communications technologies were adopted where possible to sustain communication and industrial productivity. Social media and video conferencing tools were the biggest winners from the pandemic. Yet, they were unable to mimic normal human interactions. Mainly due to their inability to convey emotion and ‘touch’.

    Virtual reality solutions rose in prominence and offered high throughput walk-throughs where these other alternatives failed. Thanks to the pandemic, VR has evolved from a fun tool for gaming and recreational activities to an advanced human communication tool. With its potentials and applications growing since then; Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook rebranded to Meta to reflect its plans to make a deep dive into researching and building human communication solutions using Virtual reality technologies. Big tech companies are jumping on the trend with talks of building a complete virtual world making major headlines throughout the last quarter of 2021.

    Metaverse — the general name for the virtual world built using VR technologies is a major discussion amongst prominent role players in the technology sector. The Metaverse will feature personalized avatars built using VR and Non-fungible token (NFT) technologies. Coined by Neal Stephenson in his 1992 novel, “Snow Crash,” and popularized by cryptocurrency and blockchain projects; the metaverse is an attempt to (re)create a world outside our world that exists in our world. That must have been tough to read. Well, it’s probably the most straightforward description of what the metaverse really is.

    Using a combination of virtual reality and decentralized digital art technologies, tech companies and startups are working to create a world where we exist in simulation and perform certain interactive activities. The only difference is, that we are not doing this in ‘real’. Remember those games where you’ll have to select an avatar that represents you? this is something similar but once again it’s not just a game.

    Different sectors are currently exploring ways of utilizing Virtual reality technology. From a whole pain management technology in health facilities built using VR technology to virtual 3D house models with close to real-life effects used by construction companies. The ‘pandemic communication tool’ is fast taking its place in our everyday life.

    Normal physical human communication still remains undefeated but VR solutions are presenting interesting ways to enhance communication and bridge the conditional gaps in human communication through a readily available means of making sensational communications.

    Virtual Reality technology is great, but here’s the deal-breaker; it doesn’t come cheap…at all. An efficient VR headset costs anywhere between $50 to $1000. Setting up a complete VR facility cost an excess of $2,000 to multiple time this figure. In addition to the costly and relatively scarce facilities, Virtual reality management personnel aren’t so rampant and might cost significantly to hire.

    Like the early days of computers and smartphones, the cost of setting up and managing an efficient VR facility is one of the major factors limiting its adoption. Currently, only high-budget companies and institutions are able to properly integrate VR technologies into their routine procedures. Average companies can only manage to set up improvisational VR or low quality setups that hardly satisfy their purpose.

    Post-pandemic workplaces and industries have come to terms with virtualized communication alternatives. Many workplaces still have ‘work from home’ options for staff. Trimming down the workplace capacity has some advantages — saved cost and enhanced productivity due to comfortable settings.

    Different sectors could benefit greatly from VR technologies if made easily affordable.

    Construction industries’ Virtual 3D housing model when fully harnessed will create cheaper house planning and offer house owners a true feel of their houses before proper completion. This will enable them to make changes to their proposed structure without tangible extra costs.

    Virtual learning which became more popular during the pandemic has developed post-pandemic. Educational institutions are exploring ways to leverage VR technologies to improve the learning process and engage even more students. Distant learning programs powered by virtual reality technology brings teacher closer to the students in much better ways than video conferences and chat rooms.

    Creative VR technologies are exploring ways to keep students engaged through fun learning processes powered by Virtual reality. This process is expected to culminate in better academic performance and the production of more qualified graduates.

    Corporate organizations have even more realistic applications of VR technologies; virtual meet-ups, virtual work offices, and virtual marketing outreaches. Financial institutions can cut a great percentage of the cost of developing and maintaining the workplace facility by using virtual alternatives where possible. Fortunately, many workplace procedures can be replaced by virtual alternatives. This will not only save costs but offer a faster way of doing things. Conveyance for meet-ups and marketing presentations would take just a few minutes if every concerned party can afford VR facilities. Turning up for emergency meetings is as easy as wearing a VR headset.

    While these brilliant uses of VR technology will inevitably boost the productivity of these industries and associated sectors, the cost of setting up VR facilities eats deep into the projected saved costs; this defeats the goal.

    Government subsidies, optimized production costs; a few work-throughs could help lower the cost of VR facilities. The latter is more feasible as government subsidies are limited and could have an even worse effect on the general economy. Tech companies should consider trimming the production cost to produce more affordable facilities. This can also be done by producing cheaper alternatives with basic yet efficient features. A widespread VR adoption will be a catalyst for the next phase of the workplace and general communication revolution.

  • Should the cryptocurrency community reward Laszlo Hanyecs for his Bitcoin pizza trade?

    Should the cryptocurrency community reward Laszlo Hanyecs for his Bitcoin pizza trade?

    bitcoin pizza

    Not until Laszlo completed that deal to swap 10,000 bitcoins for “two big pizzas”; bitcoin was basically another complicated technology with an incredible whitepaper, a blurry founder, and a community of nerds and dreamers. You guessed right; Laszlo had a ton of worthless virtual coins sitting in software on his computer screen. Thanks to a lower hash rate, earning new ones was even easier.

    He could go on playing the nerd game for as long as he wanted but then he made this announcement instead:

    Well, Laszlo had a pretty basic taste for a bitcoiner!

    It will be hard to predict exactly what was going on in his mind when he made this announcement, but I’m sure he was surprised anyone bought into his wager and sent him some pizza in exchange for 10,000 bitcoins.

    In one move, he showed just how feasible Satoshi’s theories were and gave bitcoin value. Just like Sirius would say; “a great milestone”. Anyway, they made great Pizzas then and Laszlo didn’t care about giving up five-figure bitcoins for them. It’s incredible he chose pizza for this trade. I’d have said he showed bitcoiners what could be achieved with their funny nerdy coins, but the fact is; many believed that would be the last time bitcoin would be exchanged for something reasonable…including Laszlo, probably.

    Laszlo’s happiness didn’t last for so long as his deal sparked off a cascade of bitcoin to real commodity trade. Fast forward to a few years later, bitcoin has become a global topic and the biggest economic disruption of the past two decades. It has given birth to an ecosystem and has become a revolution.

    Laszlo’s 10,000 bitcoins would go on to be worth even more pizzas and eventually turn into a staggering figure. While bitcoin got way more popular, Laszlo Hanyecs’ story got popular as well. The 10,000 bitcoin deal has a reserved date for remembrance…and fun poking. You can make an endless list of how many things you could buy with a tenth of the fee Laszlo paid for his pizza. A few sources would even rank Laszlo’s deal as one of the dumbest deals of our lifetime… this is wrong in every way.

    Laszlo will undoubtedly not get tired of being asked if he regrets his pizza trade but one thing is; considering the reputation of bitcoin at the time of this deal, Laszlo made a good choice. Unarguably, it is contemporarily unthinkable. But a look at the history of bitcoin, Laszlo Hanyecz’s deal with Jeremy Sturdivant is still worth it. Even with over two hundred and fifty-million-dollar worth of bitcoins at stake. The end justifies the means. If that’s what it takes to steer bitcoin and cryptocurrency into making a remarkable upset in the global economy, then certainly anyone will do the same. And Laszlo Hanyecz is easily one of bitcoin’s biggest heroes, just behind Satoshi Nakamoto.

    Here’s the logic; Satoshi created bitcoin, and Laszlo gave it a value. Satoshi lost his identity while Laszlo paid an ultimate prize of whatever 10,000 bitcoin might be worth by the time you consider this. For a concept that went from worthless to over a trillion dollars at some point; it was well worth it.

    Unfortunately, these two figures aren’t the biggest gainers from their actions. Satoshi might never come back to lay claims on his bitcoins and probably didn’t make a dime from his invention. He might be the brain behind those old bitcoin wallets coming back to life recently though.

    But, do you think the cryptocurrency community should reward Laszlo for kicking off cryptocurrency trading and giving out that huge stash in the process?

    Alright, I get it; he certainly made a good meal out of those two pizzas and even went on to receive more pizzas and some add-ons which includes a $500 store credit…a fair trade considering bitcoin’s reputation at that time. You’d find it pointless rewarding anyone for fair trade, that’s not wrong too. Regardless, this situation is a bit different, and looking at the role it played in the history of bitcoin; it’s reasonable to say that we are all enjoying the benefits of his 10,000 bitcoin ‘sacrifice’ and should reward him for it. Not necessarily by donating another 10,000 bitcoin to him anyways…